Forum 2.10
What Use is Latin?

Digressing from his report (Speech Day 1922), the head wanted to say something about the subject of Latin in school. He knew that many parents thought that Latin was a useless subject.
"Now most parents will agree", he continued, "that what they want for their children in sending them to a secondary school is a good practical education. But by 'practical' what is it they mean? I am afraid in many cases the parent understands by 'practical' subjects those which will enable a boy or girl to become a wage-earner quickly, but to adopt this interpretation is to miss the real meaning of education. If we only teach subjects which have an immediate cash return we shall simply turn out low grade machines doing low grade work. As a writer said: "The liftman would work his switch no worse if he were quite illiterate, and no better if he were a doctor of science. It is not as a liftman he is worth educating, but as a man."
"A 'practical' education rightly understood then," went on the headmaster, "means an education which will fit a child for the conduct of life, train it to live interestedly and intelligently, to understand things and to know what is good and what is bad, and Latin plays its part equally with other subjects. It is true that many will forget most of the Latin they will learn and the few will carry it further. That is not the point. Mathematics and Chemistry are not taught with a view to turning out accomplished mathematicians or scientists. A boy cannot sell the knowledge of geography and history acquired at the school, but that does not mean the time spent on these subjects is wasted. The child has been taught something that trains the mind, awakens latent powers and shows them how, by labour, to acquire knowledge. And if you ask me 'why can't all this be done without Latin?' the answer is two-fold: Firstly, because out of 100,000 words in the English language, no less than 60,000 are of Latin origin: secondly, Latin, by its logical precision, helps towards a habit of clear thought and expression in a way no other subject does. A teacher who did not teach Latin said: 'Latin must be kept in schools because it is the greatest training that the boy or girl can go through.' The average child's mind is a pig-sty; the child has to be taught what connected thinking is, and Latin is the only instrument that will do that. I am not going to throw over Latin for anything in the world."
"An examination held at the end of the summer term on all subjects revealed one general weakness - the inability to express clearly and concisely what was in the mind. The idea was there, but could not be produced on paper. The same criticism appeared in the reports of the different subjects - 'lack of expression,' 'no clearness of thought,' and so on. It is obvious that there are many muddled heads with plenty of good ideas in them. It is the study of Latin which will help largely to secure the clearness of expression needed."
A.G.J.
Speech Day 1924
Mr. Jenkinson once again returned to the subject of the teaching of Latin in school. Latin had been dropped by some pupils in Form V to allow more time for the study of French because it had been difficult for them to learn the two languages well enough in such a new school over less than four years. He hoped to make Latin an alternative subject to Science during the year preceding the School Certificate. Although the Headmaster had not changed his opinion as to the usefulness of learning Latin, he saw that the curriculum was crowded, and choices had to be made between Arts and Sciences. Pupils wanting to take an Arts degree should continue with Latin, but on the Science side this was not so necessary. At any rate, the present situation was that modern foreign languages needed extra study time in school, and particular attention had to be paid to this.